Friday, December 26, 2025

W. B. Yeats's Poems

From Poetic Silence to the Rough Beast: Crisis and Creation in Yeats’s War Poetry”


Introduction: 

When the world fractures under the weight of war, revolution, or global sickness, what is the role of the artist? This question lies at the heart of early 20th-century Modernism. For some, the poet is a herald of truth, shouting from the trenches; for others, the poet is a guardian of the eternal, seeking refuge in silence.

This post explores the complex poetic landscape of W.B. Yeats through two of his seminal works: "On Being Asked for a War Poem" and "The Second Coming." By examining recent academic perspectives—specifically the "Viral Modernism" theory—we move beyond traditional political readings to uncover how personal trauma and the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic shaped Yeats's apocalyptic vision. Finally, we look at the "Great Divide" in literary history: the philosophical clash between Yeats’s aristocratic detachment and Wilfred Owen’s visceral "Pity of War."


1 . Watch two videos on the poems (online class) from the blog link. Embed the videos and write brief analysis of both the poems.








1.1.  On Being Asked for a War Poem (1915):

This short six-line poem (a sextet) was written by Yeats during the early years of World War I.

Refusal as Action: The poem acts as a paradoxical "refusal as ascent." While Yeats explicitly states that a "poet's mouth be silent" in times of war, he communicates this message by actually writing a poem.

The Poet vs. The Statesman: Yeats draws a sharp line between the "truth" of a poet and the "right" of a statesman. He argues that poets have "no gift to set a statesman right," suggesting that in the heat of war, the politician’s rhetoric of nationalism often drowns out the nuanced, solitary truth of the artist.

Neutrality and Irony: The lecture highlights that as an Irish nationalist, Yeats felt no desire to write patriotic propaganda for the British Empire. He suggests poets should instead focus on the "indolence of youth" or the wisdom of old age—themes that remain human regardless of political turmoil.


1.2. The Second Coming (1919):

Written in the aftermath of World War I and during the Irish and Russian Revolutions, this is considered one of the most influential "cult poems" of the 20th century.


Apocalyptic Imagery: 

The poem begins with the famous image of the "widening gyre"—a spiral representing a civilization spinning out of control. Yeats uses the metaphor of a falcon that can no longer hear its falconer to describe a world where "things fall apart" and the "center cannot hold".


Spiritus Mundi:

 Yeats references a "world spirit" or collective universal memory. Out of this memory, he sees a "troubling sight": a Sphinx-like beast with a lion’s body and a man’s head, moving with a "blank and pitiless" gaze.

The Pandemic Connection: A unique modern reading presented in the class connects the poem's imagery—such as the "blood-dimmed tide"—to the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic. Yeats’s wife was pregnant and nearly died from the flu while he was writing this, which likely fueled the poem's sense of physical and societal "drowning" and horror.


Bethlehem: 

The poem ends with a chilling subversion of Christian hope. Instead of a benevolent Christ, a "rough beast" slouches toward Bethlehem to be born, signaling the arrival of a dark, new era of history.



2. Watch Hindi podcast on both poems from the blog link. Embed the videos and write brief note on your understanding of this podcast.




Brief Note & Understanding of the Podcast:

The podcast provides a fascinating re-interpretation of Yeats' work by blending traditional literary analysis with the "Viral Modernism" theory proposed by scholar Elizabeth Outka. Here is my understanding of the key takeaways:


2.1. Silence as Resistance ("On Being Asked for a War Poem")

The podcast explains that in 1915, during WWI, Yeats was pressured by fellow writers to contribute a patriotic poem to a charity book for refugees.

The Understanding: His refusal to write a "war poem" wasn't just about artistic preference; it was a political statement. As an Irish nationalist, writing a poem for the British Empire (the oppressor of Ireland) was impossible for him.

Relevance: The podcast compares this to the modern pressure on social media to "take a side" immediately on every issue, suggesting that Yeats’ choice to remain silent was an act of preserving personal and artistic truth over political propaganda.


2.2. The Biological Apocalypse ("The Second Coming")

While most scholars view "The Second Coming" (1919) through the lens of post-WWI political chaos, the podcast introduces a chilling "hidden" context: the 1918 Spanish Flu.

The Personal Stake: Yeats’ pregnant wife, Georgie, was fighting for her life against the flu while he was writing this poem. The podcast notes that pregnant women had a staggering 70% mortality rate during that pandemic.

Graphic Imagery: The "blood-dimmed tide" is re-read not just as war, but as a clinical description of the flu, where victims literally drowned in their own internal bleeding. The "innocence" that is "drowned" likely refers to his unborn child and sick wife.

The Beast: The "rough beast" is interpreted as the virus itself—a faceless, invisible, and "pitiless" force that, unlike a human soldier, has no motive and shows no mercy.


2.3. Final Reflection:

The podcast concludes that Yeats’ poems remain powerful because they capture the feeling of a world "falling apart" on every level—politically, spiritually, and biologically. By removing specific historical names (like Marie Antoinette) from his drafts, Yeats made the poems universal, allowing them to feel just as relevant to our modern experiences with COVID-19 and global instability as they did a century ago.


3. Refer to the study material - researchgate: Reply in the blog to the (i) Discussion question, (ii) Creativity activity and (iii) Analytical exercise

Activity 1:

Discussion Questions: o How does Yeats use imagery to convey a sense of disintegration in The Second Coming?

In “The Second Coming,” Yeats uses powerful and disturbing imagery to convey a sense of disintegration and collapse in both the natural and moral order of the world. Images such as the “widening gyre” suggest a universe spinning out of control, where stability and tradition can no longer hold society together. The falcon losing contact with the falconer symbolizes humanity’s loss of guidance, authority, and spiritual center. Yeats intensifies this breakdown through violent and chaotic images like “blood-dimmed tide” and “ceremony of innocence is drowned,” which reflect a world overwhelmed by brutality and moral confusion. Together, these images create a vision of a civilization disintegrating under the pressure of war, revolution, and spiritual emptiness, reinforcing the poem’s apocalyptic mood.


Do you agree with Yeats’s assertion in On Being Asked for a War Poem that poetry should remain apolitical? Why or why not?

I partly agree with Yeats’s assertion in “On Being Asked for a War Poem” that poetry should remain apolitical, but only within certain limits. Yeats believes that the poet’s role is not to act as a propagandist or moral instructor, especially during wartime, and this view is convincing because political poetry can easily become temporary, biased, or didactic. By valuing personal emotion and artistic integrity over public slogans, Yeats protects poetry as a space for lasting human truth rather than immediate political reaction.

However, I do not fully agree that poetry should remain entirely apolitical. History shows that poetry can powerfully respond to political violence and injustice, as seen in the war poems of Wilfred Owen or later protest poetry. When politics directly affects human suffering, silence itself becomes a political stance. Therefore, while Yeats is right to resist propaganda and forced political expression, poetry should not be barred from engaging with politics when it arises naturally from the poet’s moral and emotional experience.


Activity 2: Al generated poem:

The world spins loose from guiding hands,

Truth shouts while wisdom disappears;

The centre cracks across all lands,

Fed by our anger, ruled by fears.

What future walks from fire and screen,

Born of our haste and blind control?

The old world fades, the new unseen—

A broken age searching for soul.


Activity 3: 

Analytical Exercise: (Sample answer is given hereunder) o Compare the treatment of war in On Being Asked for a War Poem with other war poems by Wilfred Owen or Siegfried Sassoon.

Yeats’s “On Being Asked for a War Poem” treats war indirectly and with deliberate restraint, emphasizing the poet’s refusal to turn poetry into political commentary or propaganda. Rather than describing the battlefield or the suffering of soldiers, Yeats focuses on the poet’s private responsibility, suggesting that a poet should “keep his gift in the pure” and avoid using verse to instruct or console the public during wartime. War, in this poem, remains a distant presence—something that exists outside the poet’s true artistic duty.


In contrast, war poems by Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon confront war directly and vividly. Owen’s poems such as “Dulce et Decorum Est” expose the physical horror and psychological trauma of trench warfare through graphic imagery of gas attacks, wounded bodies, and shattered minds. Similarly, Sassoon’s poems like “Suicide in the Trenches” or “The General” openly criticize military authority and patriotic illusions, portraying war as senseless, cruel, and destructive. While Yeats distances poetry from politics and public emotion, Owen and Sassoon use poetry as a moral weapon to challenge lies about war and to bear witness to suffering. Thus, Yeats presents war as a subject best approached with silence and artistic purity, whereas Owen and Sassoon see poetic engagement as an ethical necessity.


Conclusion:

The contrast between Yeats and Owen reveals that literature has two vital responses to crisis: detachment and testimony. Yeats, as the "Distant Observer," used silence and mystical symbolism to protect the sanctity of art from political noise. Owen, the "Trench Witness," used visceral horror to force society to confront the brutal truth of suffering.

Whether we are facing the "blood-dimmed tide" of war or the invisible terror of a pandemic, these poets remind us that art must either act as a sanctuary for the eternal or a weapon for the truth. In a world where things still "fall apart," their voices remain the essential maps for navigating chaos.


References:


Barad, Dilip. "W.B. Yeats Poems." Dilip Barad | Teacher Blog, May 2021. [Blog Post]


Barad, Dilip. W.B. Yeats's Poems: The Second Coming - On Being Asked for a War Poem. ResearchGate, 2024. [ResearchGate]


Bauska, Barry. “Yeats: A Case for Resurrection.” The Canadian Journal of Irish Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 1979, pp. 52–68. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/25512451. Accessed 27 Dec. 2025


Brooker, Jewel Spears. “‘The Second Coming’ and ‘The Waste Land’: Capstones of the Western Civilization Course.” College Literature, vol. 13, no. 3, 1986, pp. 240–53. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25111707. Accessed 27 Dec. 2025.


Owen, Wilfred. "Dulce et Decorum Est." Poetry Foundation, 1920. [Poetry Foundation - Full Text]

Wikipedia. "W.B. Yeats." [Wikipedia Profile]

Yeats, W.B. "The Second Coming." Poetry Foundation, 1919. [Poetry Foundation - Full Text]



No comments:

Post a Comment

Drama – Absurd, Comedy of Menace

From Stage to Screen: A Critical Study of The Birthday Party This blog has been given by Megha Ma’am Trivedi. It focuses on analysing Harold...